Venue comparison
Kalshi and Polymarket together are ~95% of tracked volume. See the $1-face and notional caveats before comparing Nadex or CME with the rest.
Who is taking share, and at what take rate
granularity=MONTH rolls each metric up by its own aggregation type, so SPOT_VOLUME and FEES come back as true monthly totals. Volume gives share, fees over volume gives the implied take rate.
- Share is consolidating. Kalshi went 58.6% to 70.2% in three months. Polymarket went 28.9% to 21.9% on volume that peaked in June.
- Take rates are converging from opposite ends. Kalshi’s compressed from 1.08% to 0.92% while Polymarket’s expanded from 0.48% to 0.63%.
- July fees annualize to roughly $4.5B for Kalshi against $1.0B for Polymarket, at a flat run rate.
Which categories are driving the growth
Volume growth is only as durable as the categories behind it.dimensionType=CATEGORY composes with granularity=MONTH, turning the same call into a mix shift over time:
Sports is the largest book but a shrinking share of it: 58% to 44% while total volume more than doubled. Exotics and crypto absorbed the difference. Each month’s categories sum exactly to that month’s undifferentiated
SPOT_VOLUME, so this is a clean partition you can build a mix model on.
Metrics have their own inception dates.
ACTIVE_MARKETS for Kalshi begins on 2026-07-17, so it covers part of this window rather than all of it. Divide by the number of populated points rather than the row count, since the response returns a row per period either way.